基于分区扰动测力台的姿势控制时相划分方法
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.合肥大学设计学院合肥230601;2.安徽建筑大学机械与电气工程学院学院合肥230601; 3.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院合肥230036;4.合肥工业大学机械工程学院合肥230009

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TN06 ; TB18

基金项目:

安徽省高等学校科学研究(2024AH051526)、合肥大学人才科研基金(24RC12)项目资助


Phase-partitioning method for postural control based on a partitioned perturbation force plate
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Design, Hefei University, Hefei 230601,China; 2.School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601,China; 3.The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230036,China; 4.School of Mechanical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于自主研发的足底分区扰动测力台(partitioned plantar perturbation force plate, PP-PFP),提出一种用于解析足底支撑面扰动后人体姿势控制动态过程的时相划分方法。利用PPPFP内置的加速度与力传感器数据,基于阈值法定义了3个关键时刻:扰动开始时刻、姿势调节开始时刻与姿势调节结束时刻,进而将扰动态的姿势响应过程划分为平衡站立(balanced standing, BS)、失衡站立(imbalanced standing, IBS)、调节站立(compensatory standing, CS)与恢复平衡站立(rebalanced standing,RBS)4个时相。计算的压力中心(center of pressure, CoP)变量包括均方根距离(root mean square distance, RDIST)、平均速度(mean velocity, MVELO)、95%置信椭圆面积 (95% confidence ellipse area, AREA-CE)、轨迹长度与轨迹起终点直线距离之比 (length ratio, LR) 。分别对BS与RBS、IBS与CS的CoP变量进行配对样本t检验。结果显示,IBS与CS时相间的LR、MVELO、RDIST存在显著性差异(p<0.01),BS与RBS时相间的AREA-CE、RDIST存在显著性差异(p<0.01),结合CoP轨迹图在4个时相间的明确转换特征,初步验证了所提出的PP-PFP及其时相划分方法的有效性,为深入探究姿势控制的动态调节机制提供了一个精细化的分析框架。

    Abstract:

    Based on a self-developed partitioned plantar perturbation force plate (PP-PFP), this paper proposes a phase-partitioning method for analyzing the dynamic process of human postural control following support-surface perturbations. Using acceleration and force data from the built-in sensors of the PP-PFP, three key time points were defined based on a threshold method: the onset of perturbation, the onset of postural adjustment, and the end of postural adjustment. Accordingly, the perturbed postural response process was divided into four phases: balanced standing (BS), imbalanced standing (IBS), compensatory standing (CS), and rebalanced standing (RBS). The center of pressure (CoP) variables calculated include: root mean square distance (RDIST), mean velocity (MVELO), 95% confidence ellipse area (AREA-CE), and the ratio of trajectory length to the straight-line distance between the start and end points (length ratio, LR). Paired-sample t-tests were conducted on the CoP variables for the BS vs. RBS phases and the IBS vs. CS phases, respectively. The results showed significant differences in LR, MVELO, and RDIST between the IBS and CS phases (p<0.01), and significant differences in AREA-CE and RDIST between the BS and RBS phases (p<0.01). Combined with the clear transitional features observed in the CoP trajectory plots across the four phases, these findings preliminarily validate the effectiveness of the proposed PP-PFP and its phase-partitioning method, providing a refined analytical framework for in-depth investigation of the dynamic regulatory mechanisms of postural control.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈宝亮,夏雨晴,胡珊珊,穆景颂,王勇.基于分区扰动测力台的姿势控制时相划分方法[J].电子测量与仪器学报,2026,40(7):80-87

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《电子测量与仪器学报》
关于防范虚假编辑部邮件的郑重公告