北斗时频传递接收机内延迟校准方法的实验研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.北京交通大学自动化与智能学院北京100044;2.先进轨道交通自主运行全国重点实验室北京100044; 3.华为科技有限公司武汉研究所武汉430200

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TN965.5

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(12473072)、烟台市重大科技创新工程项目(2024ZDCX002)、泰山产业领军人才(tscx202408155)资助


Experimental study on internal delay calibration methods of Beidou time-frequency transfer receiver
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Rail Autonomous Operation, Beijing 100044, China; 3. Wuhan Research Institute of Huawei Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430200, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    全球导航卫星系统(global navigation satellite system, GNSS)时频传递接收机广泛应用于诸多重要领域的时间同步系统及节点中,其内延迟的精密校准是实现高精度时频传递的重要保证。针对纳秒量级的时频传递需求,开展北斗时频传递接收机绝对与差分校准方法的实验研究。首先,比较分析分步、整体绝对校准和差分校准方法原理及差异性,基于GNSS暗室环境和共钟差场景分别设计实施方案。实验中依托由时频信号分配及模拟、暗室环境、精密测量、被校系统等搭建的校准比对系统和智能化校准验证软件,开展不同类型北斗时频传递接收机在B1I、B1C、B2a、B3I及L1 C/A频点内延迟的校准比对实验,评估测量不确定度并分析各校准方法。实验结果表明,分步、整体和差分校准方法的测量不确定度分别优于0.71、0.98和1.27 ns,各频点内延迟校准值吻合在3种校准方法的不确定度范围内,验证了校准比对实验的有效性及整体绝对校准方法的优越性,形成亚纳秒不确定度水平的时频信号校准能力。

    Abstract:

    The GNSS time-frequency transfer receiver is widely used in time synchronization systems and nodes across various critical fields, where precise calibration of internal delay is essential for achieving high-accuracy time-frequency transfer. To address nanosecond-level time-frequency transfer requirements, experimental research is conducted on absolute and differential calibration methods for BeiDou time-frequency transfer receivers. First, the principles and differences of step-by-step, integrity absolute, and differential calibration methods are compared and analyzed. Based on GNSS anechoic chamber and common-clock-difference scenery, implementation plans are designed accordingly. Calibration comparison experiments are conducted for different types of BeiDou time-frequency transfer receivers at B1I, B1C, B2a, B3I, and L1 C/A to evaluate measurement uncertainty and analyze various calibration methods. The experimental results demonstrated that the measurement uncertainties of the step-by-step, integrity, and differential calibration methods are better than 0.71, 0.98 and 1.27 ns, respectively. The delay calibration values within each frequency point are consistent within the uncertainty ranges of the three calibration methods, verifying the effectiveness of the calibration comparison experiment and the superiority of the integrity absolute calibration method, forming a time-frequency signal calibration capability with sub-nanosecond uncertainty levels.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李雨峰,梁坤,余沺,陈俞任,巴晓辉.北斗时频传递接收机内延迟校准方法的实验研究[J].电子测量与仪器学报,2026,40(3):164-175

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-05-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《电子测量与仪器学报》
关于防范虚假编辑部邮件的郑重公告